Home / Litigation Intelligence
Litigation Intelligence
Intelligence across every dispute you face
Litigation Intelligence reads every dispute you face as one record. One at a time, each one looks new. Together they show a pattern. The same clause keeps producing claims, and the same parties keep coming back. See it early and you settle more of them, sooner and for less.
Thousands of disputes, read as one.
Why read disputes together
Most companies meet their disputes one at a time. A claim comes in, someone answers it, it settles or it does not, and the file closes. Handled this way, every dispute looks new. Most are not. The same clause produces them, and a handful of the same filers keep coming back, often under a new name. One at a time you cannot see it, and it costs you. You pay fees you could have avoided and settle claims you could have won. Litigation Intelligence reads them together.
What one public file shows
32,831 consumer cases, each one handled on its own
Arbitration providers in the US have to publish their consumer cases. Take one such file. Most of these cases settled, and fewer than one in ten reached a decided award. Read together, the same names and the same patterns keep turning up.
A few companies turn up again and again. The same name, hundreds of times.
- IBM941
- Dollar Tree878
- Uber810
- Twitter635
- GoodLeap340
- JPMorgan Chase311
Each company handles claims its own way. In the same file, one settled almost every claim it saw. Another fought nearly all of them to a decision. Same rules, opposite choices. You only see that by reading the cases together.
Source: JAMS consumer case disclosures, 32,831 cases, which providers have to publish by law. The figures show the problem Litigation Intelligence is built for. They are not our data.
What Litigation Intelligence does
Six things you cannot see one case at a time
The pattern behind the pile
Near-identical claims are grouped as they arrive, so a wave of them reads as one event with one cause behind it. Find the cause and you can stop the next wave.
The parties who come back
Litigation Intelligence matches a claimant or a firm across cases. A filer who returns under a new name, or a firm sending the same claim a hundred times, shows up as one record for your team to confirm.
The fee before you pay it
Litigation Intelligence works out what a wave of filings would cost in fees, from your own caseload and the fee schedule that applies, and shows who pays. You see the bill before the meter starts.
Resolved earlier, or avoided
Like claims get the same answer, settled inside the window your terms already give you. What keeps coming back goes to the team that can fix it, so there is less of it next time.
Your position, measured
See your settlement rate and how long your cases run, against your own history and the public record. You know where you stand before the other side does.
One view, every team
Every number comes from your own cases and exports in open formats. Your legal and finance teams work from the same view, with no report to wait for.
The financial-intelligence lens
The same move banks make against fraud, for disputes
A bank does not read one transaction to spot fraud. It works out who is who across millions of them, and watches for what a person would miss: the same account under two names, or a charge it already refunded.
Litigation Intelligence does the same for the claims against you. It matches a party across cases, and flags a claim filed twice or a filer who keeps coming back. It decides nothing. It puts the pattern and the proof in front of a named person, who makes the call on the record.
Where it comes from
It runs on the record every case already leaves
Litigation Intelligence is not a second system to feed. Every case already runs on a record, each step logged and timed: who filed, what kind of claim, how it ended, what it cost. The intelligence is that record seen from above. The day a dispute is on the record it is already in the picture, and the picture sharpens with every case that closes.
How it stays safe to use
Litigation Intelligence surfaces, a person decides
A pattern is a reason to look, nothing more. A named person reviews whatever Litigation Intelligence surfaces, and both the prompt and the decision stay on the record.
The model has no write path
The model suggests. It never writes the record. A flag asks a person to look, and the software labels no one.
A person decides
The software calls nothing fraud and acts on no claim. A named person reviews each pattern and decides what to do, on the record.
Only your own cases
You see only your own cases, encrypted on the way. The figures on this page are public JAMS data, shown as an example, not your data.
Yours to export
Export any view, or all of it, in open formats, whenever you want. It is a term of your contract.
Hosting, where your data sits, source code in escrow, and how your cases may be used by any AI model: all of it is in the contract before go-live.
Straight answers
Questions teams ask first
Is this predicting who will win a case?
No. It reads what has already happened across your cases and shows you the pattern and the parties behind it. It does not score a claim or guess an outcome. A person reads it and decides what to do.
Does it label people as fraudulent?
No. It surfaces repeat filings and duplicates a reviewer would otherwise hunt for by hand, with the evidence and the count beside them. The software calls nothing fraud and acts on no claim. The person decides, on the record.
Where does the data come from?
Your own cases, from the moment they open. There is nothing to integrate first. Once a dispute is on the record, it is in the picture. The figures on this page come from JAMS public disclosures, and are there to show the problem, not your caseload.
Does it work before we have years of history?
Yes. The grouping and the repeat-party matching work on the cases you have now, from the first ones. The public figures give you something to measure against while your own history builds.
How is this different from a legal AI tool pointed at our files?
A general tool reads a document you hand it. Litigation Intelligence reads the live record of every case, under the rules each one runs on, so it can see across them, the same clause and the same filer turning up again and again. That comes from running the cases, not from a model reading a file.
See the pattern in your own cases
Book a working sessionBring your dispute clause and a few recent cases. The session runs 45 minutes, and we reply within one business day.