Home / Legal teams and law firms
Handle in-house what you currently send out
Most legal teams send out work they could have kept, because capacity runs out long before judgment does. SpyroLex does the reading and the drafting so the team can take on more of its own claims, and settle them before they harden into litigation.
How it helps
The capacity to keep a dispute, rather than the obligation to send it
A claim arrives, the system reads it against your own terms and the rules that apply, and drafts a position with the points that matter. Your lawyer decides what it is worth and what to do about it.
Run the negotiation or the internal process on your own playbook, so the matters that never needed outside counsel stay with the people who know the relationship.
When a matter does have to go out, or on to a formal stage, it carries one record. Nothing is rebuilt and nothing is lost in the handover.
Avoidance
A dispute gets expensive at the handover
Very few disputes are expensive because the law is hard. They get expensive because a matter leaves the people who understand it, and is rebuilt from a file and an email trail by people who do not. Every handover costs time, costs money, and loses something.
The half of our work nobody asks for is the early half: the claim read properly the first time, the position taken on your own terms, the record kept from the start. That is what makes a dispute settle while settling is still cheap.
When a matter does escalate, it moves on the same system into mediation, a scheme, or a formal decision, carrying one record the whole way.
The cheapest dispute is the one that never leaves the building
Confidentiality
No model trains on your cases
We set out where your cases are hosted, and the terms that govern it, before any agreement.
You hold the ledger, and you export or delete it on your terms.
encrypted in transit / the record is hash-chained, never edited in place
Straight answers
Questions we get asked
We already send this work to outside counsel. Why would we keep it?
Because much of it was never a question of judgment, it was a question of capacity. SpyroLex does the reading and the drafting so a lawyer who already understands the matter can decide it, which is usually faster and cheaper than briefing someone who does not.
Is this a case management system?
No. A case management system holds the matter and moves it between stages. SpyroLex reads the file against your own terms and the rules that apply, drafts the position, and keeps a record of what it proposed and what a person decided. The difference shows when someone asks you to justify how a claim was handled.
What stops this becoming a machine deciding our disputes?
A person decides, always. SpyroLex drafts and a named lawyer reviews, changes and signs, and both halves are recorded separately. Any function can be switched off, and both the default and the change go on the record.
How does this relate to avoiding litigation?
Most disputes become expensive at the handover, when a matter leaves the people who know it and is rebuilt by people who do not. SpyroLex is built so the early stage is run properly and the record carries forward, so fewer matters escalate and the ones that do arrive whole.
We are a law firm, not an in-house team. Does this apply?
The same system runs either way, because it is configured from the rules and the playbook you work to rather than a fixed workflow. Many arbitrators and mediators are practising lawyers, and the work of running a matter is the same work.
See it run on your own matters
When a matter escalates, the same system runs mediation, a published scheme and formal arbitration.